Why Dallas Willard Sometimes Frustrates Me

“A missional church, in a wording often used today, is actually one that cannot be stopped from increasing, because it grows by contiguity – skin on skin.”

 

Why I Love Dallas Willard

 

 ”Life is primarily devoted to work.  All legitimate work is devoted to the creation of value, of what is good to a lesser or greater degree.  That was God’s plan.  He not only creates; he creates creators – you and me.  One of the saddest things in human life is the desecration of work in a loveless world.  Discipleship to Jesus, properly guided by pastors, enables individuals to find in their work a divine calling and see the hand of God in their efforts to create what is good and to serve others in love.”  

 

 

I keep thinking this book will finally set on my shelf for a while, but occasions that call for it keep coming up.  So foundational.  So articulate.  So indespensible.  I’m excited for our house church conversations revolving around Mr. Wright’s book this fall.

What’s Real?

I recently revisited some of my favorite childhood books – Madeleine L’Engle’s “Wrinkle in Time” series.  Reading the books now –  as a somewhat thoughtful adult – I am struck by how much the theme of reality pervades all of her work.  The looming question is, “what’s real and what’s not real?”  Of course, that’s a pretty relevant question in our pop culture today, as well, considering the popularity of recent movies (The Matrix Trilogy, A Beautiful Mind), TV shows (Lost), and books (Twilight).    

Sunday at Beggars Table we discussed – among other things – what makes our reality (i.e. the lens through which we view ourselves and our world).  The truth is that all of our realities are profoundly shaped be certain cultural systems and psychological situations.  In other words, our immediate environment strongly influences how we perceive reality.  

Big Question: Can our immediate environment be trusted to bestow an accurate picture of reality?  

I would write more and offer my answer to the question, but I’m afraid I would begin sounding “preachy”, and I honestly never wanted my blog to be that.  (There’s a fine line between “preachy” and “provocative” isn’t there?)  So, in the spirit of the blog – what do you think? (I’ll get “preachy” in my responses if anyone wants to try…)

Regarding Humanity…

Beggars Table is currently wrestling with Deitrich Bonhoeffer’s ideas and theology surrounding the condition of being human.  I truly appreciate our Sunday conversations!  As we navigate through the idea that God’s desire for us is to be fully human – as Jesus is fully human – I am reminded of how strongly we need a thorough and grounded theology of creation.  

Many of us have become so accustomed to looking at humanity through a lens of degradation and brokenness that we often insinuate, whether we mean to or not, that God’s creation somehow wasn’t good enough or complete in and of itself.  If you listen closely, many well intentioned Christians subtly suggest that Jesus Christ saves us from humanity.  What an uncomfortable and unstable position for people who adhere to an orthodox faith that boldly proclaims Jesus Christ is fully human (as well as fully divine).   

We have to realize that God wants us to be exactly what he created – no more, no less.  This involves, among other things, believing God when he asserts that his creation is good.  Make no mistake – the Holy Spirit is not a foreign entity to the human condition.  Genesis reveals that part of being created human is to be in intimate relationship with God.  Sin, rather, is the foreign entity that invades humanity and distorts it from its original intention and design.      

Sin is antihuman – it works against God’s intention in creation.  Jesus and the Holy Spirit aid us in reclaiming our humanity.  

“We are called to be human as Jesus Christ is human, we are not to deny our humanity but to live in the world as whole people, as human beings.” – Dietrich Bonhoeffer

The Church is People…

A provocative quote from Belfast pastor of Ikon, Peter Rollins.  What do you think?

“Paradoxically, I say, Ikon doesn’t care about you. Ikon doesn’t give a crap if you are going through a divorce. The only person who cares is the person sitting beside you, and if that person doesn’t care, you’re stuffed. People will say, ‘I left the church because they didn’t phone me when my dad died, and that was really hurtful.’ But the problem is not that the church didn’t phone but that it promised to phone. I say, ‘Ikon ain’t ever gonna phone ya.’ Pete Rollins might. But if he does, it will be as Pete Rollins and not as a representative of Ikon. Ikon will never notice if you don’t come. But if you’ve made a connection with the person sitting next to you, that person might.
Ikon is like the people who run a pub. It’s not their responsibility to help the patrons become friends. But they create a space in which people can actually encounter each other.”

Have You Ever Felt Like an Investment?

One thing I mentioned Sunday as we continue to  press and deconstruct the idea of “Relational Ministry” is that our language truly reflects our meaning and intentions…even when we’re not aware of it.  One of the words I’ve always used and heard used in teaching, training, and discussing ministry is a form of the word “investment”.  

“I’m going to invest in him.”  

“We’re investing in kids this summer”.  

“I really want to invest in you.”

The word “investment” is a financial term that comes from the world of finances and banking (it’s always a warning sign when we flippantly use financial metaphors to discuss human relationships).  Investment specifically refer to getting a return on something we put in.  We invest when we expect something in return.    

What do we mean when we say we’re going to “invest” in a person?  Usually we mean that we’re willing to pour a certain amount of time and energy into a person with the expectation that we will see a certain result from our efforts.  We often justify this because the return we’re going for is something good (i.e. accepting Jesus, etc).  Maybe the return is good – but is this truly relationship?  Is this a healthy practice?  Is this what God does with us? 

As I mentioned Sunday, I don’t know if I’ve ever had a relationship with a church or para-church organization when I didn’t feel like an investment of sorts/”invested in”.  I am invited into relationship but only with the understanding that the relationship will provide a certain return.  Although having people “invest” in you often feels affirming and strokes the ego (“you think enough of my potential that you’re willing to pour into me?”), it inevitably leaves us feeling rather used and abandoned.  

Is investment what happened through the incarnation?

I offer the following quote to provoke the imagination and discussion:

“The incarnation is not about influence but about accompaniment”  (Andrew Root)

Continuing the Conversation

We need metaphors as we talk about and try to imagine our future and the consummation of our story.  It’s like looking into a midst and describing what we see…none of us knows fully.  Sunday we spent a little time with four metaphors Scripture gives us:

Seedtime/Harvest: The promise (especially when talking of Jesus as “first-fruit”) that there is more to come…

Citizenship: Living in colony and spreading the influence of our country rather than waiting to go back…

Birth Pangs: Bringing about/waiting for new creation may be painful and slow…

Marriage: God’s creation and God’s new creation one day wedding…made for each other as male and female…

 

How do these metaphors provoke your imagination?

Continuing the Conversation

Our conversation Sunday was framed around the question, “why this – why now?”  In other words, Paul has just written one of his longest letters (1 Corinthians) which whole-heartedly concentrates on the issue of congregational behavior.  His entire letter has been grounded in a “thesis” statement of sorts found in 1:10 when Paul urges the church to “get rid of divisions and be united in mind and thought”.  At first glance, it seems rather odd that Paul would end this letter with an extensive dissertation on the importance of Jesus’ resurrection.  Wouldn’t it make more sense to end this letter in chapter 13 with an exhortation to “love one another”?  Why not write a separate letter about the resurrection and its significance?  

It almost seems as if Paul is suggesting that our faith in the resurrection is intimately linked with our communal behavior.  Hmmmmm………

Fun and encouraging conversation Sunday.  Thanks everyone!  And a special “thank you” to those of you who reassured me that I’m not the only one who has grown somewhat hesitant to use the phrase “saved” in its various evangelical shapes (i.e. Jesus Saves, We’ve been Saved, etc.).

Continuing the Conversation

What a posture our faith places us in!  We recognize the reality of evil, and we don’t deny the presence of suffering, grief, and pain.  Yet we are also a people characterized by hope.  Sunday we reflected on the question, where does this hope come from?  The answer to this question is the core of the Easter message…

Contrary to Western Enlightenment thinking, our hope does not lie in the “Myth of Progress”.  We aren’t hopeful because we believe in humanity’s power to achieve and move the human experience forward.

Our hope also does not lie in Platonic dualism.  In other words, we aren’t hopeful because Jesus Christ has promised to simply save us from this evil world.  We don’t cling to a doctrine of “escapism”.  

Our hope lies in the resurrection of Jesus.  We believe and hope that God will do for us and all creation what he did for Jesus on Easter morning – make a whole new creation.